Loading...

Battling Online Gaming Fraud: The Ultimate Combat

by Alex Lvoff 6 min read December 20, 2023

The online gaming industry has experienced tremendous growth in recent years, with millions of players engaging in immersive virtual worlds and competitive gameplay. Unfortunately, this surge in popularity has also sparked an increase in online gaming fraud. Unscrupulous individuals have sought to exploit the industry through fraudulent activities, leading to financial losses and reputational damage for gaming vendors.

According to a recent study conducted by Lloyds Bank, children are spending more time playing online games than ever before – over five million children between the ages of three and 15 are now regularly playing games online, up from approximately 4.6 million in 2019.

Fraudsters, always ready to take advantage of opportunities presented by new trends, are now increasingly targeting this rising demographic. Gaming vendors have a responsibility to shield minors from fraud in online gaming by implementing robust safety measures, educating young players and their parents, and actively monitoring and addressing fraudulent activities.  

A vulnerable target

That same study from Lloyds revealed that over a third (36%) of parents are concerned about the possibility of their children falling victim to gaming fraud and losing money. In today’s tech-savvy world, the ease of payment authorization has only exacerbated these concerns. All it takes for a child to make a payment is to key in their parents’ online store username and password. It is a practice fraught with danger. Parents can only do so much to safeguard their children while gaming, and despite their best efforts, there will always remain a lingering possibility of encountering scammers. 

Gaming vendors should establish robust age verification processes during account creation to ensure that minors are not exposed to age-inappropriate content. Additionally, they should incorporate comprehensive parental controls that allow parents to regulate their children’s online activities, including chat limitations, spending controls, and access to certain features.

But contrary to common assumptions, the gaming population is not restricted to teenagers or young adults. With an average age of 35, gamers have significant purchasing power and actively participate in the gaming ecosystem. They spend an average of over six hours per week gaming, dedicating nearly an hour each day to their preferred gaming experiences. This engagement is spread across all age groups and financial profiles, making the gaming community a vast market to attract cybercrime.

Types of fraud in online gaming

In 2022, the revenue from the worldwide gaming market was estimated at almost 347 billion U.S. dollars, with the mobile gaming market generating an estimated 248 billion U.S. dollars of the total. The gaming market is constantly evolving, and technological advancements are opening new possibilities for game developers to create more immersive and engaging experiences.

But alarming reports indicate that scammers have honed in on the younger demographic of gamers, leveraging their innocence to exploit their finances and identities. Identity theft (67%) and hacking (61%) rank as the two most prevalent forms of fraud experienced by young gamers, according to the Lloyds Bank study. Here are some different types of online gaming fraud:

  1. Account hacking: Hackers employ various techniques like phishing, keylogging, and credential stuffing to gain unauthorized access to players’ accounts. Once compromised, accounts could be used for fraudulent activities, including unauthorized in-game transactions or selling virtual assets for real money.
  2. Chargeback fraud: This occurs when players make legitimate purchases within a game using real money and then issue chargebacks, falsely claiming that the transaction was unauthorized or fraudulent. This results in financial losses for gaming vendors as they lose the revenue and virtual goods/services provided to the player.
  3. Virtual asset fraud: Virtual assets, such as in-game currency, items, or characters, hold economic value. Fraudsters engage in scams involving fake virtual asset transactions or market manipulation, exploiting players’ desires to acquire rare or high-value items.
  4. Match-fixing and cheating: Competitive gaming is at the heart of many online games. Fraudsters seek to manipulate matches, exploit glitches, or use cheat software to gain an unfair advantage over others. This undermines the integrity of the gaming experience and discourages fair competition.

The game changer for online platforms: fraud prevention strategies 

Given the anticipated growth of these threats in the foreseeable future, it is imperative that online platforms prioritize the protection of young gamers and their parents. In line with the enhanced safeguards and anti-fraud initiatives observed in banks and financial institutions, it is high time for game companies to elevate their security and consumer protection measures by adopting the following guidelines:

  1. Implement strong account security measures: Encourage players to create unique, complex passwords, and consider implementing multifactor authentication solutions. Regularly educate players about common hacking techniques and promote safe browsing habits to prevent phishing attempts.
  2. Utilize fraud detection systems: Invest in advanced fraud detection tools that employ machine learning algorithms and biometrics templates to identify suspicious activities and patterns. These systems can flag potentially fraudulent transactions, allowing you to take appropriate measures promptly.
  3. Monitor and analyze user behavior: Keep an eye on players’ activities and digital identity, such as unusual login patterns, high-value transactions, or frequent chargebacks. Analyze gameplay data, interactions, and purchasing behavior to identify patterns indicative of fraud or cheating.
  4. Secure payment processing systems: Choose reputable payment gateways that prioritize security measures. Employ tokenization and encryption technologies to safeguard players’ payment information during transactions. Regularly test and update your payment system’s security infrastructure.
  5. Raise player awareness: Educate your player community about common fraud techniques and the importance of securing their accounts with identity authentication. Share security tips through newsletters, blog posts, and in-game messaging. Foster a culture of vigilance and encourage players to report any suspicious activities.
  6. Foster fair gameplay and zero tolerance policy: Implement robust anti-cheat measures and regularly update your game to address vulnerabilities and exploits. Promote fair competition and enforce a zero-tolerance policy against cheating, match-fixing, and other forms of unfair gameplay.

Leveling-up

Ultimately, the ability to protect players online could be the ultimate gamechanger for gaming platforms. By embracing identity verification mechanisms that rely on secure and privacy-centric facial recognition, online fraud and identity theft can be significantly curtailed. Moreover, the verification and onboarding processes can be streamlined, simplifying the user experience further. Just as bringing top-tier games on board is crucial, game platforms must ensure their customers engage in a secure gaming environment. 

Streamlining the onboarding and sign-in process is essential to remain competitive. But how do you balance the need for speed and ease of use with essential ID checks? 

By combining the best data with our automated ID verification checks, Experian helps you safeguard your business and onboard customers efficiently. Using passive, invisible checks when customers sign into their accounts helps to keep fraudsters at bay and protects legitimate players without the need for irritating security challenges. Experian’s best-in-class solutions employ device recognition, behavioral biometrics, machine learning and global fraud databases to spot and block suspicious activity before it becomes a problem.

*This article leverages/includes content created by an AI language model and is intended to provide general information.

Related Posts

For many banks, first-party fraud has become a silent drain on profitability. On paper, it often looks like classic credit risk: an account books, goes delinquent, and ultimately charges off. But a growing share of those early charge-offs is driven by something else entirely: customers who never intended to pay you back. That distinction matters. When first-party fraud is misclassified as credit risk, banks risk overstating credit loss, understating fraud exposure, and missing opportunities to intervene earlier.  In our recent Consumer Banker Association (CBA) partner webinar, “Fraud or Financial Distress? How to Differentiate Fraud and Credit Risk Early,” Experian shared new data and analytics to help fraud, risk and collections leaders see this problem more clearly. This post summarizes key themes from the webinar and points you to the full report and on-demand webinar for deeper insight. Why first-party fraud is a growing issue for banks  Banks are seeing rising early losses, especially in digital channels. But those losses do not always behave like traditional credit deterioration. Several trends are contributing:  More accounts opened and funded digitally  Increased use of synthetic or manipulated identities  Economic pressure on consumers and small businesses  More sophisticated misuse of legitimate credentials  When these patterns are lumped into credit risk, banks can experience:  Inflation of credit loss estimates and reserves  Underinvestment in fraud controls and analytics  Blurred visibility into what is truly driving performance   Treating first-party fraud as a distinct problem is the first step toward solving it.  First-payment default: a clearer view of intent  Traditional credit models are designed to answer, “Can this customer pay?” and “How likely are they to roll into delinquency over time?” They are not designed to answer, “Did this customer ever intend to pay?” To help banks get closer to that question, Experian uses first-payment default (FPD) as a key indicator. At a high level, FPD focuses on accounts that become seriously delinquent early in their lifecycle and do not meaningfully recover.  The principle is straightforward:  A legitimate borrower under stress is more likely to miss payments later, with periods of cure and relapse.  A first-party fraudster is more likely to default quickly and never get back on track.  By focusing on FPD patterns, banks can start to separate cases that look like genuine financial distress from those that are more consistent with deceptive intent.  The full report explains how FPD is defined, how it varies by product, and how it can be used to sharpen bank fraud and credit strategies. Beyond FPD: building a richer fraud signal  FPD alone is not enough to classify first-party fraud. In practice, leading banks are layering FPD with behavioral, application and identity indicators to build a more reliable picture. At a conceptual level, these indicators can include:  Early delinquency and straight-roll behavior  Utilization and credit mix that do not align with stated profile  Unusual income, employment, or application characteristics High-risk channels, devices, or locations at application Patterns of disputes or behaviors that suggest abuse  The power comes from how these signals interact, not from any one data point. The report and webinar walk through how these indicators can be combined into fraud analytics and how they perform across key banking products.  Why it matters across fraud, credit and collections Getting first-party fraud right is not just about fraud loss. It impacts multiple parts of the bank. Fraud strategy Well-defined quantification of first-party fraud helps fraud leaders make the case for investments in identity verification, device intelligence, and other early lifecycle controls, especially in digital account opening and digital lending. Credit risk and capital planning When fraud and credit losses are blended, credit models and reserves can be distorted. Separating first-party fraud provides risk teams a cleaner view of true credit performance and supports better capital planning.  Collections and customer treatment Customers in genuine financial distress need different treatment paths than those who never intended to pay. Better segmentation supports more appropriate outreach, hardship programs, and collections strategies, while reserving firmer actions for abuse.  Executive and board reporting Leadership teams increasingly want to understand what portion of loss is being driven by fraud versus credit. Credible data improves discussions around risk appetite and return on capital.  What leading banks are doing differently  In our work with financial institutions, several common practices have emerged among banks that are getting ahead of first-party fraud: 1. Defining first-party fraud explicitly They establish clear definitions and tracking for first-party fraud across key products instead of leaving it buried in credit loss categories.  2. Embedding FPD segmentation into analytics They use FPD-based views in their monitoring and reporting, particularly in the first 6–12 months on book, to better understand early loss behavior.  3. Unifying fraud and credit decisioning Rather than separate strategies that may conflict, they adopt a more unified decisioning framework that considers both fraud and credit risk when approving accounts, setting limits and managing exposure.  4. Leveraging identity and device data They bring in noncredit data — identity risk, device intelligence, application behavior — to complement traditional credit information and strengthen models.  5. Benchmarking performance against peers They use external benchmarks for first-party fraud loss rates and incident sizes to calibrate their risk posture and investment decisions.  The post is meant as a high-level overview. The real value for your teams will be in the detailed benchmarks, charts and examples in the full report and the discussion in the webinar.  If your teams are asking whether rising early losses are driven by fraud or financial distress, this is the moment to look deeper at first-party fraud.  Download the report: “First-party fraud: The most common culprit”  Explore detailed benchmarks for first-party fraud across banking products, see how first-payment default and other indicators are defined and applied, and review examples you can bring into your own internal discussions.  Download the report Watch the on-demand CBA webinar: “Fraud or Financial Distress? How to Differentiate Fraud and Credit Risk Early”  Hear Experian experts walk through real bank scenarios, FPD analytics and practical steps for integrating first-party fraud intelligence into your fraud, credit, and collections strategies.  Watch the webinar First-party fraud is likely already embedded in your early credit losses. With the right analytics and definitions, banks can uncover the true drivers, reduce hidden fraud exposure, and better support customers facing genuine financial hardship.

by Brittany Ennis 6 min read February 12, 2026

Discover why Experian’s unified fraud prevention platform, backed by decades of data stewardship and AI innovation, is the trusted choice for enterprises seeking scalable, compliant, and transparent identity verification solutions.

by Laura Davis 6 min read December 8, 2025

Learn how you can mitigate e-commerce fraud with identity verification and fraud prevention best practices.

by Theresa Nguyen 6 min read December 3, 2025